Skip to main content

Honesty is not the best policy

Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States of America is known to be the speaker of the famous quote, “Honesty is the best policy”. Working with powerful historical figures such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin is quite popular for demonstrating acts of honesty and integrity. But we must ask ourselves, was he right? Is honesty really the best policy?


There exists a concept in the study of modern psychology called psychological egoism which is a view that humans are always motivated by self-interest and selfishness, even if the acts seem altruistic in nature. A more specific form of this view is called psychological hedonism. This is the view that the ultimate nature for all voluntary human action is the desire to experience pleasure or avoid pain.

Keeping these two views in mind, let us redirect our attention to the original question that was posed: Is honesty really the best policy? We, as humans, tend to expect situations to be in either black or white formats. We find it easier when there is a right, which is distinct from when there is a wrong. However, we must also acknowledge that life often does not present in such a binary manner. There are grey spots in existence, where the line between right and wrong, between black and white is blurred.

Knowing the concept of psychological egoism and hedonism, we must now ask ourselves what exactly was Benjamin Franklin talking about? What did he mean by “best policy”? Was he trying to say that life is easier when one is honest? If so, we then have to deal with the issue of white lies. White lies are trivial lies, usually told to avoid hurting someone.

Consider this: A mother, who is very sick, wishes to make one last pie (or any dish) for her son before she dies. She endured terrible hardships to gain the ingredients needed. The pie is made and served with love. But the pie is terrible to taste. Should the son be honest and tell her it is terrible, breaking her heart before her death? Or should he avoid causing hurt in her final moments?


The point I am trying to make is to persuade you, the reader, to see that honesty is not the best policy, but a convenient one. Being honest, while it displays integrity and honor like what Benjamin Franklin stood for, it tends to and should be used in a manner of convenience. Context, scenario and situation are the determining factors as to whether honesty should be the best policy at a particular time.

Doing things of convenience is almost a law of nature. It is how beings survive. Why should the rules governing honesty, which is not even tangible, be any different?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hello Internet

What’s up?  And the internet replied, “ Quarantine “. On January 11, 2020, China announced to the world the first death from the COVID-19 virus. Since then, a lot has happened. Jobs vanished, economies were brought to their knees, currencies dropped and beloved stars were lost to history. Hundreds died and thousands were infected. Many businesses went out of order. Yet, the human race trudged on. Almost every country on the planet locked its borders down. Issued out a curfew and enforced it with aggressive passion. The largest pandemic of the 21st century had impacted thousands of lives in every country, in every continent. People were made to stay in their homes. A single word gained more popularity than Einstein ever had. That word:  Quarantine . Musicians and artists took to the internet to reach their fans and showcase their art. Charities shot up in support of the unfortunate victims to the corona-virus. Social Media had never seen such large usage rates before....
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting human behavior

I was reading this book on the extent of the seemingly insignificant nonverbal behaviors influencing the perception of others and I thought it was interesting. I think that subconsciously, people pick up certain behavioral cues, without even knowing about people. This would lead to creating preconceived notions and "I don't know why, but I don't like him/her." Usually it's something small. For example, when you first meet a person and you don't see them smile, you may not think a big deal of it, but later on, the subconscious will hold on to it and you may eventually find yourself thinking of sadness or depression the next time you think of this person. It is said that we cannot be certain of the way that humans behave. I agree in the sense that one may not be able to completely determine the behavior of another in a social setting, but I was wondering if, by being more aware of body language and other nonverbal cues, could we control the cues that we subcon...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Reincarnation Theory ~ Part 2

Part 1 needs to be read to understand Part 2. You can find Part 1 here: https://internautofgenz.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-reincarnation-theory.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Imagine a world with 3 people. A, B, and C. If A is true souled, then B and C are simulated. A dies, goes to B. Then C and A are simulated. B dies goes to C. A and B are simulated. C dies, hits up A. A suicides. Time block ends. New time block, B is a true soul and on and on and on until that true soul has inhabited all A, B, and C. For better understanding: A dead. B dead C dead A suicides -----new time block----- You have to remember, this ties into fate and destiny. I use suicide to talk about self-termination. It could happen because of stress, crime, whatever, long as it happens. Introducing a new concept; One Timestream is defined as: ================== -----Time block 1----- A dead. B dead C dead A suicides -----Time block 2----- B dead. C dead A dead B su...
Post a Comment
Read more