Skip to main content

Honesty is not the best policy

Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States of America is known to be the speaker of the famous quote, “Honesty is the best policy”. Working with powerful historical figures such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin is quite popular for demonstrating acts of honesty and integrity. But we must ask ourselves, was he right? Is honesty really the best policy?


There exists a concept in the study of modern psychology called psychological egoism which is a view that humans are always motivated by self-interest and selfishness, even if the acts seem altruistic in nature. A more specific form of this view is called psychological hedonism. This is the view that the ultimate nature for all voluntary human action is the desire to experience pleasure or avoid pain.

Keeping these two views in mind, let us redirect our attention to the original question that was posed: Is honesty really the best policy? We, as humans, tend to expect situations to be in either black or white formats. We find it easier when there is a right, which is distinct from when there is a wrong. However, we must also acknowledge that life often does not present in such a binary manner. There are grey spots in existence, where the line between right and wrong, between black and white is blurred.

Knowing the concept of psychological egoism and hedonism, we must now ask ourselves what exactly was Benjamin Franklin talking about? What did he mean by “best policy”? Was he trying to say that life is easier when one is honest? If so, we then have to deal with the issue of white lies. White lies are trivial lies, usually told to avoid hurting someone.

Consider this: A mother, who is very sick, wishes to make one last pie (or any dish) for her son before she dies. She endured terrible hardships to gain the ingredients needed. The pie is made and served with love. But the pie is terrible to taste. Should the son be honest and tell her it is terrible, breaking her heart before her death? Or should he avoid causing hurt in her final moments?


The point I am trying to make is to persuade you, the reader, to see that honesty is not the best policy, but a convenient one. Being honest, while it displays integrity and honor like what Benjamin Franklin stood for, it tends to and should be used in a manner of convenience. Context, scenario and situation are the determining factors as to whether honesty should be the best policy at a particular time.

Doing things of convenience is almost a law of nature. It is how beings survive. Why should the rules governing honesty, which is not even tangible, be any different?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Internaut Bushido

There is a code we must abide by at all times. And I don’t mean the ten Internaut commandments. This code is about basic internet surfing etiquette and it has recently been brought to my attention that there are only a few users online who still follow the code. The Internauts aren’t just internet-using kids. We are the future. We are GenZ. We are the internet samurai. And this is our Bushido.  Note: There is no particular order because all these points are equally important.  If you are going to quote or use art owned by someone, you cannot change their quote or artwork. If you wish to rework / paraphrase, either mention that you have paraphrased or ask the original creator for their permission. Use respectful language and if circumstances need you to be in character, be consistent about it. Sloppy work is unacceptable. Fact check your reposts. Reposting means you vouch for the credibility of the post being reposted. If they lose their credibility, so do you. Be able to back ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Psych Discussions

I have been thinking again of two different topics and this post is a sort of a report on my thoughts of these two topics. I would love to hear your thoughts, either pro or con about the concerned topic. Discussion 1 The Harnessing of intrapersonal conflict to build a better understanding of the self (in terms of self esteem and confidence, etc) After some research on the topic of intrapersonal conflict, I have noticed that there are some cases where the inner monologue or "voice in your head" are in multiples. So someone may not have just one voice that they think in, but multiple voices that could have a conversation among themselves and result in the ultimate decision that person may choose. I believe that they call this polyphonic internal narration. These are not rare cases of people but they are not common cases either. I would say "uncommon" is a better suiting word. Regardless, the existence of such a case got me thinking. The most simplified basic way this ...
Post a Comment
Read more

|Random Post #1|

Is it possible to be with a small group of people for an hour almost everyday, and know next to nothing about each other? Even in prison, criminals spend a lot of time with other criminals and make friends. Humans are social creatures, aren’t they? So why is it that I have spent at least an hour on my bus transport every work day for almost two years and know not much about the same regular passengers? From my house to school, which is in the main town. Even when you see them on the road, you feel excited and anxious, “Hey, I know you!” But do you, really? Most passengers plug in their headphones and listen to music to distract their brains from thoughts. These are also the same people who want change and advancement in society. This lady I sit next to in the bus, I finally broke the ice and we had a nice conversation. I learnt her name, what she does for a living (health statistician) and how many kids she goes home to. Before today I didn’t even know health statistics was a thing. Wh...
Post a Comment
Read more