Skip to main content

Honesty is not the best policy

Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States of America is known to be the speaker of the famous quote, “Honesty is the best policy”. Working with powerful historical figures such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin is quite popular for demonstrating acts of honesty and integrity. But we must ask ourselves, was he right? Is honesty really the best policy?


There exists a concept in the study of modern psychology called psychological egoism which is a view that humans are always motivated by self-interest and selfishness, even if the acts seem altruistic in nature. A more specific form of this view is called psychological hedonism. This is the view that the ultimate nature for all voluntary human action is the desire to experience pleasure or avoid pain.

Keeping these two views in mind, let us redirect our attention to the original question that was posed: Is honesty really the best policy? We, as humans, tend to expect situations to be in either black or white formats. We find it easier when there is a right, which is distinct from when there is a wrong. However, we must also acknowledge that life often does not present in such a binary manner. There are grey spots in existence, where the line between right and wrong, between black and white is blurred.

Knowing the concept of psychological egoism and hedonism, we must now ask ourselves what exactly was Benjamin Franklin talking about? What did he mean by “best policy”? Was he trying to say that life is easier when one is honest? If so, we then have to deal with the issue of white lies. White lies are trivial lies, usually told to avoid hurting someone.

Consider this: A mother, who is very sick, wishes to make one last pie (or any dish) for her son before she dies. She endured terrible hardships to gain the ingredients needed. The pie is made and served with love. But the pie is terrible to taste. Should the son be honest and tell her it is terrible, breaking her heart before her death? Or should he avoid causing hurt in her final moments?


The point I am trying to make is to persuade you, the reader, to see that honesty is not the best policy, but a convenient one. Being honest, while it displays integrity and honor like what Benjamin Franklin stood for, it tends to and should be used in a manner of convenience. Context, scenario and situation are the determining factors as to whether honesty should be the best policy at a particular time.

Doing things of convenience is almost a law of nature. It is how beings survive. Why should the rules governing honesty, which is not even tangible, be any different?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Reincarnation Theory

I was wondering upon how different religions have their stands on reincarnation, and if it were possible, how it would work and I reached an almost working theory. Who knows, maybe it's true. I could not find anything on the internet relating to my idea, so I wanted to post it here to hear your thoughts on it and if you may know of a similar theory that some human in the history of humanity probably already came up with:  Okay, sothis theory can also work to explain the “deja-vu” and definitions as well as explanations for time. However, it doesn’t solve the birth to death rate ratio problems.  Time flows in blocks. Each event in the block is cyclic. For example, if I die, I can be reborn as someone else, and all the life events can happen in the same way. Maybe, sometimes, decisions could be different, leading to different results, but the main events would be the same. Each time a person dies, their soul would be transferred to another body and the rotation will continue with eac
Post a Comment
Read more

Learn something new everyday #1

Today I learned about Wolfgang Engels. He is  a former East German soldier. In late April 1963, the man stole a military tank from his base while the crew was at lunch and drove it right through the Berlin wall to escape from East Berlin to West Berlin. The East Berlin populace was so used to seeing tanks out on the streets that they actually stopped traffic to let the guy pass. The tank got stuck halfway through the wall and he got out, under heavy fire and successfully made the escape. He got his freedom, but his mother (a devout communist) disowned him. He became a biology teacher, retired and now works as a Docent at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. The badassery of it. The sheer idea that "Tank. Wall. Let's do it" and then actually doing it. Damn. There were other folks who beat the Berlin wall as well.  In May 1963, Austrian Heinz Meixner drove a convertible right under the checkpoint gate. He realized the car is just short enough to make it, so he removed th
Post a Comment
Read more

Predicting human behavior

I was reading this book on the extent of the seemingly insignificant nonverbal behaviors influencing the perception of others and I thought it was interesting. I think that subconsciously, people pick up certain behavioral cues, without even knowing about people. This would lead to creating preconceived notions and "I don't know why, but I don't like him/her." Usually it's something small. For example, when you first meet a person and you don't see them smile, you may not think a big deal of it, but later on, the subconscious will hold on to it and you may eventually find yourself thinking of sadness or depression the next time you think of this person. It is said that we cannot be certain of the way that humans behave. I agree in the sense that one may not be able to completely determine the behavior of another in a social setting, but I was wondering if, by being more aware of body language and other nonverbal cues, could we control the cues that we subcon
Post a Comment
Read more